![]() Here's what you can look forward to watching (or not watching) on the big screen in 2019. And maybe it will pick up more fans on Digital/Blu-ray.īut so far, Mortal Engines is not doing its part to help the 2018 box office reach that new milestone. It's possible word-of-mouth will help Mortal Engines be The Little Engine That Could. Peter Jackson had said he was very excited to make Mortal Engines sequels, based on the books, but this box office opening is a bad sign for that. It also has a B- CinemaScore from polled moviegoers. The good news for Mortal Engines is that it not only had a higher Rotten Tomatoes score than Robin Hood, it also currently has a fresh Audience Score of 61%, vs. Robin Hood: Men in Tights (1993) Adventure Comedy Musical Romance Cary Elwes, Richard Lewis, Roger Rees, Amy Yasbeck The Woman in Black (2012) Drama Fantasy Horror Thriller Daniel Radcliffe, Janet. That's not always a death sentence, especially at the international markets. ![]() What went wrong? Well, both Mortal Engines and Robin Hood suffered from bad reviews. Robin Hood grossed 30.8 million in the United States and Canada, and 54 million in other territories, for a total worldwide gross of 84.8. Deadline said rival film finance sources suggested the Mortal Engines loss could be closer to $150 million after all ancillaries are factored in. Financial analysis of Robin Hood (1973) including budget, domestic and international box office gross, DVD and Blu-ray sales reports, total earnings and profitability. Deadline estimates that Mortal Engines will lose at least $100 million.Ī loss of $105 million would be based on Mortal Engines getting a global gross of $120 million, they reported, which doesn't seem like a reasonable hope at this point. My rating is 3/10.Based on this low domestic opening, and the fact that it's already playing overseas, it doesn't look like Mortal Engines will even be able to catch up to Robin Hood's $73.5 million.īoth Mortal Engines and Robin Hood had reported production budgets of $100 million, but that never covers everything. I would rather have watched "The adventures of Robin Hood" (1938) or "Robin Hood, prince of thieves" (1991) than waste two and a half hours on this disappointment. What I liked most about the movie was the revision of Lady Marian's character, well portrayed by Cate Blanchett, but that's about that. The heart of the director and of the main actor are just not there, and it shows. Cast information Crew information Company information News. With a stellar cast featuring the likes of Russell Crowe and Cate Blanchett, Robin Hood had pretty good acting but the story. Even the battle scenes feel boring, predictable, and not spectacular at all. Robin Hood (1922) A nobleman becomes the vigilante Robin Hood who protects the oppressed English people from the tyrannical Prince John. It is almost inevitable to compare this to "Gladiator", because the latter excels at all the points that "Robin Hood" fails at. It is a failed epic, devoid of passion, adventure, or feeling. I was surprised at how boring this movie turned out to be. So Ridley Scott tried to take a new approach on a well-known story, but the results are not impressive. It is by all practical means a "prequel" to the classic legend of Robin Hood. Russell Crowe, Cate Blanchett, Matthew Macfadyen, Max von Sydow. It presents all the known characters, though many of them are vastly underused, and it describes how they came to know each other and become involved in each other's lives. Robin Hood (2010) Action Adventure Drama History. This is rather the (embellished) narration of how Robin Longstride came to be Robin Hood. After the merciless Sheriff of Nottingham orders a brutal attack on his family, a young man named Robin swears bloody revenge. As it has repeatedly been pointed out, you should not go into this expecting to find one more version of the "prince of thieves" theme. Robin Hood (2010) In twelfth-century England, Robin Longstride and his band of marauders confront corruption in a local village and lead an uprising against the crown that will forever alter the. Technically and aesthetically accomplished, but empty of substance, and full of pretentiousness, this "Robin Hood" is, in my opinion, one absolutely unnecessary revision of the mythical English archer's story.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |